Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
Jatin KumarDepartment of Electrical Engineering

Projects

Course projects, from transistor-level circuit design to RTL and device modelling. Where a project was done in a team, the contribution of each member is listed.

10-bit Differential SAR ADC

EE 719 · Mixed-Signal VLSI Design · Spring 2026

Guide: Prof. Maryam Shojaei Baghini

Jatin Kumar (comparator controller, comparator and ADC integration, characterization) · Prajwal Nayak (capacitive DAC, DAC switches, SAR logic, final integration)

A 10-bit differential SAR ADC sampling at 200 MHz from a 1 V supply, with a 1 V differential full-scale range, designed in Cadence Virtuoso.

62.475 dB SNDR and 10.084-bit ENOB at 50 MHz input

  • Comparator controller: generates the comparison clock from the comparator's ready signal, with a 190 ps feedback inverter delay. The comparator resolves a 1 LSB input in about 238 ps, so at least 10 comparisons fit in the 4.5 ns hold phase of the 5 ns track-and-hold clock (10% track duty cycle).
  • Integrated the comparator, controller, capacitive DAC and SAR logic into the full converter and verified the SAR switching sequence against a hand-calculated output code.
  • Characterised the converter with a 4096-point coherent FFT. The ENOB from Cadence (10.084 bits) agrees with the value computed from SNDR to within 0.001 bit.
  • Measured INL and DNL with a differential ramp. A ramp that moves more than one LSB within a 5 ns conversion skips codes, so a slower 10240-cycle ramp was used to exercise every code.
FFT characterization.
ParameterValue
Sampling frequency200 MHz
Input frequency50 MHz
FFT4096 points, coherent, rectangular window
SNDR62.475 dB
SFDR62.51 dBc
ENOB10.084 bits
FFT spectrum of the ADC output with a single tone at 50 MHz and a flat noise floor
FFT of the ADC output for a 50 MHz input, sampled at 200 MHz (4096 points).

Keywords: Mixed-signal, Cadence Virtuoso, MATLAB

InGaAs/AlInAsSb SACM Avalanche Photodiode for 1550 nm LiDAR

MM 618 · Optoelectronic Properties, Materials & Devices · Spring 2026

Guide: Prof. Tanushree H. Choudhury

Jatin Kumar · Sthiti Padhi

An electrical, optical and materials analysis of the separate-absorption-charge-multiplication (SACM) avalanche photodiode on InP, with an InGaAs absorber and an Al0.7In0.3As0.79Sb0.21 digital-alloy multiplier, for 1550 nm LiDAR detection.

Analysis of the device reported by B. Guo et al., APL Photonics 8, 116112 (2023).

0.76 eV conduction-band offset · ~49% single-pass absorption at 1550 nm · 0.26% lattice mismatch to InP

  • Band alignment: band parameters and Anderson heterojunction offsets for every interface. The 0.76 eV conduction-band offset between InGaAs and AlInAsSb acts as an electron barrier at the blocking layer and is why the grading layers are needed.
  • Fermi levels: computed layer by layer with Boltzmann, Joyce–Dixon or exact Fermi–Dirac statistics, chosen from each layer's degeneracy. This corrected our mid-semester version, which used Boltzmann statistics throughout and was off by up to 0.27 eV in the most heavily doped layer.
  • Equilibrium: vacuum-level analysis gives a built-in potential of about 1.12 eV across the stack, with the multiplication layer fully depleted at equilibrium.
  • Optics: layer optical constants from Vegard's law, and a MATLAB transfer-matrix (TMM) model for the absorption and EQE. Single-pass absorption in the 1 µm InGaAs absorber is about 49.3% at 1550 nm. The simulated EQE lies below the reported values, which we attribute to bowing of the alloy refractive indices that Vegard's law does not capture.
  • Materials: lattice mismatch to InP of 0.26% from Vegard's law, and thermal strain after cooling from the 470 °C growth temperature of 4.9 × 10−4 in the absorber and 2.0 × 10−4 in the multiplier, both within the 5 × 10−4 elastic limit.
  • Noise: for the reported k = 0.02–0.04, McIntyre's model gives an excess noise factor of about 2.14 at a gain of 10, comparable to silicon. The reported maximum gain is about 17.
External quantum efficiency without an anti-reflection coating.
WavelengthTMM modelReported
1064 nm62%73%
1310 nm53.9%61%
1550 nm39.5%57%
Simulated external quantum efficiency against wavelength with reported values marked at 1064, 1310 and 1550 nanometres
Simulated EQE (TMM, blue) against the values reported by Guo et al. (red markers).
Bar chart of the fraction of light absorbed in each layer at 1064, 1310 and 1550 nanometres
Fraction of light absorbed in each layer at 1064, 1310 and 1550 nm. Most is absorbed in the undoped InGaAs layer.

Keywords: Devices, MATLAB, TMM, Vegard's law

Matrix Multiplication: Loop Unrolling, Word Parallelism and Blocking

EE 789 · Algorithmic Design of Digital Systems · Spring 2026

Guide: Prof. Madhav Desai

Hardware design of a 64 × 64 int8 matrix multiplication in AHIR. The assignment first studies three optimisations separately; this part combines all three, cutting the run from 2,670,785 to 180,417 clock ticks. All 4096 outputs match the baseline.

14.8× fewer clock ticks than the naive baseline

  • Word parallelism: matrices are stored as 64-bit words that each pack eight int8 values (A row-major, B column-major), so a dot product reads 16 wide words instead of 128 byte-wide values.
  • A pipelined dot8 operator multiplies eight byte pairs in parallel and adds them in a three-level tree.
  • The remaining eight-iteration loop is fully unrolled, which removes its phi-merges, condition checks and branches.
  • The three optimisations target different bottlenecks (memory accesses, loop control and the serial accumulation), so their gains compound. Blocking alone did not help, since AHIR has no cache to exploit.
Clock ticks for the 64 × 64 multiplication.
ConfigurationTicksSpeedup
Naive baseline2,670,7851.00×
Loop unrolling only1,749,1851.53×
Word parallelism only680,1293.93×
Blocking only2,691,2650.99×
All three combined180,41714.8×

Keywords: Digital, AHIR

2×2 Packet Switches: Shared-, Input- and Output-Queued

EE 789 · Algorithmic Design of Digital Systems · Spring 2026

Guide: Prof. Madhav Desai

Three 2×2 packet switch architectures in VHDL-2008, built from one common packet FIFO and small arbiter state machines, and compared on queueing, fairness and head-of-line blocking.

  • Packets are sequences of 32-bit words. The header word holds an 8-bit destination, a 16-bit length and an 8-bit sequence ID, and packets are at most 64 words.
  • A parameterised FIFO with a combinational peek port lets an arbiter read a header without removing it. All three designs share this FIFO.
  • Every module is a small FSM (at most three states). Arbiters are round-robin, and a packet is served completely before the arbiter switches inputs.
  • Verified with three traffic scenarios (one active port, both ports to the same destination, both ports to different destinations), plus a test that shows head-of-line blocking in the input-queued design. Simulated with GHDL and inspected in GTKWave.
Comparison of the three architectures.
Shared-queueInput-queuedOutput-queued
FIFOs124
Head-of-line blockingNoYesNo
Throughput under contentionFull58.6% (theoretical limit)Full
Hardware complexityLowMediumHigh

Keywords: Digital, VHDL-2008, GHDL, GTKWave

Two-Stage OTA with Frequency Compensation

EE 618 · CMOS Analog VLSI Design · Autumn 2025

Guide: Prof. Rajesh Zele

A differential two-stage OTA, taken from schematic through full-custom layout and parasitic extraction.

63 dB gain · 118 MHz unity-gain frequency · 113 V/µs slew rate · 0.3 mW

  • Designed the amplifier in Cadence Virtuoso with RC and tracking compensation, reaching 63 dB gain, 118 MHz unity-gain frequency, 113 V/µs slew rate and 60–72° phase margin within a 0.3 mW power budget.
  • Drew a full-custom layout of 34.35 × 45 µm² with common-centroid matching and structured routing on the critical devices.
  • Cleared DRC and LVS, then ran Quantus parasitic extraction to validate the final layout.

Keywords: Analog, Cadence Virtuoso, Quantus

Noise Cancellation and Digital Filtering in Verilog

EE 671 · VLSI Design · Autumn 2024

Guide: Prof. Laxmeesha Somappa

Four noise-reduction filters in RTL, carried through synthesis, place-and-route and full-custom layout.

  • Implemented LMS, spectral subtraction, Wiener and median filters in Verilog, each with a testbench.
  • Synthesised with OpenLane, including floorplanning, placement and routing, and extracted timing and power metrics.
  • Drew full-custom layouts in Magic, ran DRC, LVS and antenna checks and fixed the violations to produce GDS-ready layouts, and weighed area, power and frequency trade-offs.

Keywords: Digital, Physical design, Verilog, OpenLane, Magic

ECG Amplifier Circuit

EE 230 · Analog Circuits Laboratory · Spring 2024

Guide: Prof. Anil Kottantharayil

An electrocardiogram front-end built from scratch, with right-leg drive and notch filtering.

  • Built the complete amplifier chain with right-leg drive (RLD) and a notch filter to capture the cardiac signal cleanly and suppress interference.
  • Debugged circuit performance together with teammates.

Keywords: Analog